Canadian Injured Workers Society

SIGN THE PETITION!

TAKE ACTION
JOIN the CIWS

workers compensation Canadian Injured Workers Society for workers compensation reform

What's Wrong with Workers Compensation?

NEWS
Injured Workers' Stories
About Us
Current Activities
Past Activities
Commissions & Reports
Law Court Decisions
Related Articles
Medical Professionals
Employees' Info
Employers' Info
Politicians' Info
Resources
Privacy and Copyright
Contact
Home

SIGN THE PETITION!




Back to Article Index



September 04, 2007

Work Injury That Exacerbates Pre-Existing Condition Is Compensable

"The lesson to be learned from this case is that workers are entitled to be compensated for their on-the-job injuries even if the injury is partially caused by a preexisting condition. If the accident or specific traumatic incident at work exacerbates a preexisting condition, that fact would support an order for payment of workers' compensation benefits."

Employer Liable for Making Back Condition Worse

Raleigh Personal Injury Lawyer

Editor: Brent Adams

Firm: Brent Adams & Associates

By Brent Adams

North Carolina law provides that if a worker suffers a specific traumatic incident which worsens a preexisting injury or defect in the back, then the worker is entitled to workers' compensation benefits as a result of the worsening of the preexisting back condition.

An example of that law arose in the case of Queen v. Penske Corp. in this case, the worker was born with a back condition known as lumbar spinal stenosis.

In addition to this preexisting condition, the worker sustained a back injury at work while lifting a tire.

The North Carolina Industrial Commission ordered that the employer pay for the employee's surgery at some point in the future. This order was authorized by a North Carolina law, N.C.G.S. section 97-25.1 which provides that if the Industrial Commission determines that there is a substantial risk of the need for further surgery, the Industrial Commission may order the payment of that future surgery. This is true even though surgery would not be recommended at the time the order was issued.

The case was appealed to the North Carolina Court of Appeals. The appeals court noted that even though the injured worker's doctor said that his underlying back condition was congenital (existed at birth), since the doctor also stated that a work related lifting incident caused the worker's pain and would be the reason the worker would need surgery, the doctor's testimony supported the Industrial Commission's finding and conclusion that the worker's medical expenses were related to his compensable injury.

The doctor testified as follows: "I do not know exactly how much back trouble he had prior to the time he lifted the tire. He did not see me for it if he had back trouble and I think that if he had no pain prior to the time he lifted the tire and he had pain after he lifted the tire, then it's related to lifting the tire."

The doctor also stated that if the worker had surgery: "It would be for the lumbar spinal stenosis, which is congenital, and I think the reason he'd have to have surgery is because that - either that got worse or he kept injuring himself trying to do the type of work he does."

The lesson to be learned from this case is that workers are entitled to be compensated for their on-the-job injuries even if the injury is partially caused by a preexisting condition. If the accident or specific traumatic incident at work exacerbates a preexisting condition, that fact would support an order for payment of workers' compensation benefits.

For more information on this subject matter, please refer to the section on Workers Compensation.


http://raleigh.injuryboard.com/employer-liable-for-making-back-condition-worse.php?googleid=11247


Back to Article Index